Digital Harm Assessment and Content Enforcement
We provide a structured, evidence led service to identify, document, and address harmful online content across search engines, platforms, hosting providers, and domain registrars.
Our work focuses on preserving evidence to a court ready standard, preparing precise and policy aligned notices, and managing a disciplined escalation process through platforms, hosts, registrars, and regulators where appropriate. We track outcomes, follow up systematically, and report clearly to clients throughout the process.
Typical matters
For individuals, directors, professionals, and organisations experiencing reputational harm, harassment, impersonation, or the ongoing visibility of false or misleading material online.- Harassment and targeted campaigns
- Impersonation and identity misuse
- Persistent defamatory narratives
- Doxxing and privacy breaches
- Search visibility suppression and monitoring
We do not run bulk or automated submissions. All notices are evidence led and proportionate.
What the service covers
- Identification and mapping of harmful online content
- Evidence capture and preservation
- Preparation and submission of platform, host, registrar, and search engine notices
- Disciplined escalation and follow up
- Outcome tracking and client reporting
Action is based on captured material and verifiable facts. We avoid speculation, exaggeration, and emotional language.
What the service does not do
- Provide legal advice
- Draft or file court pleadings
- Represent clients in litigation
- Make threats or allegations not supported by evidence
- Guarantee removal or deindexing outcomes
Where clients engage legal counsel, we can coordinate evidence packs and procedural correspondence under client authority.
Anonymised case study
Context: A senior professional with cross border business interests experienced the ongoing visibility of false and misleading online content ranking prominently in search results. The material was being used to harass the individual and undermine professional relationships.
Approach: We conducted a jurisdiction aware search footprint scan, mapped priority URLs by severity and visibility, preserved evidence to a court ready standard, and prepared statement schedules based strictly on verbatim quotations and verifiable facts. Platform first enforcement was undertaken, followed by host and registrar escalation where required. Search engine deindexing was submitted selectively and with procedural accuracy.
Outcome: High visibility content was removed or disabled at source where policy breaches were established. Residual material that could not be removed was deindexed from primary search results in key jurisdictions. Ongoing monitoring was implemented to detect re publication.
Archetype Intelligence did not provide legal advice or conduct litigation. The engagement focused on intelligence gathering, evidence preservation, administrative enforcement, and disciplined escalation within platform and regulatory frameworks.
Engagement and payment
Engagements are scoped and quoted based on the nature of the content, the number of URLs involved, jurisdictions affected, and the level of escalation required. Fees are payable upfront prior to commencement of work.
Action is based on captured material and verifiable facts. We avoid speculation, exaggeration, and emotional language.
What the service does not do
- Provide legal advice
- Draft or file court pleadings
- Represent clients in litigation
- Make threats or allegations not supported by evidence
- Guarantee removal or deindexing outcomes
Where clients engage legal counsel, we can coordinate evidence packs and procedural correspondence under client authority.
Request a confidential assessment
Provide a brief outline of the issue and up to five priority URLs. If you do not yet have URLs, describe the search terms and jurisdictions.
Do not include sensitive personal information in this form. If needed, we will provide a secure channel after initial triage.